AI Visibility
measured8/100
Invisible · in Content & Knowledge
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals45/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
3
across 398 prompts
AI Share of Voice
3%
across 398 prompts
Critical Issues
6
critical + high
Shortlist Position
0/80
Not Visible · Developer Tools Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Content & Knowledge
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Your visibility gap
POEditor surfaces in 0/80 Developer Tools discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 80 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
POEditor has meaningful B2B citation inputs (public pricing with tiers and a Gartner Peer Insights product page), but it is missing from the highest-intent “best developer tools for [small businesses/startups/enterprise/remote teams]” discovery shortlists. The single highest-ROI fix is to publish developer-tools-category landing pages and evaluation content that explicitly targets those buyer queries (with crawlable, SSR text blocks) so AI engines can shortlist POEditor for “best developer tools” patterns.
Based on audit of poeditor.com · Jun 29, 2026