AI Visibility
measured40/100
Frequently Cited · in Office & Productivity
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals68/100
Solid fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
95
across 109 prompts
AI Share of Voice
100%
across 93 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Office & Productivity
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Executive summary
Pluralsight is very likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party B2B review presence on G2 (1,373 reviews) and a publicly accessible pricing page with explicit team pricing (e.g., $399/month per user billed annually for Teams). The highest-ROI fix is to strengthen first-party evaluation content for comparison-style queries ("Pluralsight vs X" / alternatives) and ensure structured data coverage (SoftwareApplication + FAQPage) so AI can cite Pluralsight’s own pages instead of only third-party review sites.
Based on audit of pluralsight.com · May 7, 2026