[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Pluralsight
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

68

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

93

across 68 prompts

AI Share of Voice

100%

across 52 prompts

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
45 category
Cited100%45/45
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
6 brand-level
Cited100%6/6
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.7avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.3avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.3avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Executive summary

Pluralsight is very likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party B2B review presence on G2 (1,373 reviews) and a publicly accessible pricing page with explicit team pricing (e.g., $399/month per user billed annually for Teams). The highest-ROI fix is to strengthen first-party evaluation content for comparison-style queries ("Pluralsight vs X" / alternatives) and ensure structured data coverage (SoftwareApplication + FAQPage) so AI can cite Pluralsight’s own pages instead of only third-party review sites.

Based on audit of pluralsight.com · May 7, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy