AI Visibility
measured44/100
Frequently Cited · in Construction Software
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals9/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
27
across 148 prompts
AI Share of Voice
27%
across 148 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Construction Software
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories PlanSwift is visible in
1Executive summary
PlanSwift is already well-positioned for AI citation in evaluation and trust queries because it has strong third-party review presence (notably G2) and first-party evaluation content like a PlanSwift vs STACK comparison page. The highest-ROI fix is to strengthen structured data + technical crawlability signals (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/AggregateRating and llms.txt/robots.txt verification), because those directly determine whether AI engines can reliably cite PlanSwift for pricing and integration/evaluation prompts.
Based on audit of planswift.com · Sep 29, 2026