AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in Image Generation
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals1/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
8
across 169 prompts
AI Share of Voice
8%
across 169 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Image Generation
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Pixelz is likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has a G2 profile with 30 reviews and a 4.3/5 rating, plus strong LinkedIn authority (13,733 followers). The biggest citation risk is conversion-stage and evaluation-stage “self-citation”: Pixelz has public pricing with a $95/mo tier, but there’s no clear evidence (from live search) of SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured data or first-party “[Pixelz] vs [Competitor]” comparison pages.
Based on audit of pixelz.com · Sep 1, 2026