AI Visibility
measured57/100
Frequently Cited
measured from this brand's audit prompts
AEO Readiness
fundamentals68/100
Solid fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
68
across 16 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in its category
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured across this brand's own audit prompts (it isn't in a tracked category rollup yet). Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Executive summary
Ping Identity is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage IAM/IAM-adjacent queries because it has strong third-party review authority (e.g., 106 G2 reviews with a 4.4/5 rating) and clear analyst/enterprise signals (Gartner Peer Insights profile exists). The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen first-party evaluation surfaces for AI (especially SoftwareApplication/FAQPage coverage and crawlable comparison/pricing evaluation blocks) so brand-aware queries like “Ping Identity vs Okta” and “Ping Identity pricing” can be answered from pingidentity.com rather than only from third parties.
Based on audit of pingidentity.com · May 5, 2026