[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Pimberly
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

0

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

14

across 171 prompts

AI Share of Voice

14%

across 171 prompts

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
90 brand-level
Cited0%0/90
Share of voice0%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors—
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
8 brand-level
Cited100%8/8
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
8 brand-level
Cited100%8/8
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
8 brand-level
Cited100%8/8
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Pimberly is visible in

1
  • Digital Asset Managementnot yet measured→

Executive summary

Pimberly is already strongly positioned for AI citation on evaluation-stage “best PIM software” prompts via its G2 presence (218 reviews, 4.4★) and first-party pricing page with public tier pricing. The biggest risk is conversion-stage and evaluation-stage comparison coverage: if first-party “[Brand] vs Akeneo/inriver/Salsify/Plytix/Sales Layer” pages and structured evaluation Q&A are thin or not crawlable, AI will default to third-party comparison sources instead of citing Pimberly.

Based on audit of pimberly.com · Jun 5, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy