AI Visibility
measured90/100
Frequently Cited · in Multi-Agent Frameworks
measured from this brand's audit prompts
AEO Readiness
fundamentals34/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
95
across 12 prompts
AI Share of Voice
95%
across 12 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Multi-Agent Frameworks
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured across this brand's own audit prompts (it isn't in a tracked category rollup yet). Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
phidata.com is redirected to agno.com, which breaks first-party brand citation for phidata.com-specific evaluation queries. The biggest AI-citation risk is evaluation-stage “phidata vs X / alternatives to phidata / phidata pricing” queries—because first-party comparison/pricing crawlability and structured evaluation surfaces are not reliably attributable to phidata.com.
Based on audit of phidata.com · Sep 21, 2026