AI Visibility
measured40/100
Frequently Cited · in Developer Tools
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals44/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
93
across 145 prompts
AI Share of Voice
100%
across 129 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Developer Tools
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Executive summary
parseplatform.org is likely cited by AI engines mainly for developer-oriented “how to deploy/use Parse Server” and community discussion queries, but it is weak for B2B evaluation/conversion patterns (especially pricing and structured evaluation). The single highest-ROI fix is to add/ensure crawlable first-party evaluation assets (public pricing + SoftwareApplication/FAQPage schema + brand-led comparison pages) so AI can cite parseplatform.org for “alternatives to Parse” and “Parse pricing” style prompts.
Based on audit of parseplatform.org · Sep 1, 2026