AI Visibility
measured17/100
Emerging · in Digital Asset Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals60/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
12
across 166 prompts
AI Share of Voice
12%
across 166 prompts
Critical Issues
2
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Digital Asset Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Papirfly is visible in
1Executive summary
Papirfly is already well-positioned for AI citation in evaluation-stage queries because it has a strong G2 presence (140 reviews, 4.5★) and first-party comparison pages like “Papirfly vs Bynder” and “Papirfly vs Frontify.” The biggest remaining blocker for conversion-stage and structured evaluation answers is pricing transparency: the /pricing page is publicly crawlable but does not show fixed tiers/prices, which reduces AI’s ability to cite “How much does Papirfly cost?” accurately.
Based on audit of papirfly.com · Jun 7, 2026