AI Visibility
measured51/100
Frequently Cited · in Insurance Tech
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals41/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
16
across 439 prompts
AI Share of Voice
16%
across 439 prompts
Critical Issues
6
critical + high
Shortlist Position
0/80
Not Visible · Billing Invoicing Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Insurance Tech
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Your visibility gap
Origami Risk surfaces in 0/80 Billing Invoicing discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 80 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
Origami Risk is a B2B SaaS vendor with real AI-citable third-party validation (G2 shows 12 reviews at 4.6/5), but it is unlikely to be cited for generic “billing & invoicing tools” queries because its first-party billing content is insurance/P&C specific rather than freelancer/SaaS/e-commerce billing software. Highest-ROI fix: publish evaluation-ready, use-case-specific pages that directly answer the gap queries (freelancers, SaaS companies, enterprise orgs, e-commerce) and add SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured data so AI engines can extract “what it is / who it’s for / how to manage recurring billing / customer billing efficiently.”
Based on audit of origamirisk.com · Jun 7, 2026