AI Visibility
measured26/100
Emerging · in Video Editing
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals46/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
10
across 412 prompts
AI Share of Voice
10%
across 412 prompts
Critical Issues
8
critical + high
Shortlist Position
0/80
Not Visible · Content Marketing Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Video Editing
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories OpusClip is visible in
3Your visibility gap
OpusClip surfaces in 0/80 Content Marketing discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 80 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
Executive summary
Opus.pro is likely to be cited for “video clipping / short-form repurposing” use cases, but it is effectively invisible for content marketing software queries (especially enterprise/SaaS/team strategy prompts). The single highest-ROI fix is to publish first-party, crawlable evaluation content that directly answers the gap queries (strategy + “what is content marketing software” + enterprise/SaaS/team fit) and to add SoftwareApplication/Organization structured data so AI engines can confidently cite opus.pro for those evaluation patterns.
Based on audit of opus.pro · Sep 1, 2026