AI Visibility
measured59/100
Frequently Cited · in 3D & CAD
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals25/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
51
across 201 prompts
AI Share of Voice
51%
across 201 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in 3D & CAD
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Onshape is visible in
1Executive summary
Onshape is already strongly positioned for AI citations in evaluation-stage queries via third-party review platforms (e.g., TrustRadius shows 79 reviews and Capterra shows 342 reviews). The biggest remaining risk is conversion-stage citation reliability: ensure pricing and evaluation pages are fully crawlable/SSR and add/verify SoftwareApplication + FAQPage structured data so AI engines can confidently answer “Onshape pricing” and “Onshape vs X” questions from first-party sources.
Based on audit of onshape.com · Jun 9, 2026