[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Onshape
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

25

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

37

across 180 prompts

AI Share of Voice

37%

across 180 prompts

Category Visibility

#1

in 3D & CAD · of 123

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
105 category
Cited29%30/105
Share of voice21%avg
Engine consensus54%of engines
Competitors23.2avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors4.8avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Onshape is visible in

1
  • 3D & CAD1 of 123→

Executive summary

Onshape is already strongly positioned for AI citations in evaluation-stage queries via third-party review platforms (e.g., TrustRadius shows 79 reviews and Capterra shows 342 reviews). The biggest remaining risk is conversion-stage citation reliability: ensure pricing and evaluation pages are fully crawlable/SSR and add/verify SoftwareApplication + FAQPage structured data so AI engines can confidently answer “Onshape pricing” and “Onshape vs X” questions from first-party sources.

Based on audit of onshape.com · Jun 9, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy