[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexBlogBook
[unCited]/ONES.com
ProductCitation IndexBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

9

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

14

across 84 prompts

Critical Issues

6

critical + high

Shortlist Position

0/80

Not Visible · Project Management Software Discovery

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
72 prompts
Cited0%0/72
Share of voice0%avg
Engine consensus0%of engines
Competitors—
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 prompts
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 prompts
Cited75%3/4
Share of voice75%avg
Engine consensus92%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 prompts
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories ONES.com is visible in

1
  • Project Management Softwarenot yet measured→

Executive summary

ONES.com is a B2B project management SaaS and has meaningful AI-citation assets (G2 presence, first-party comparison pages, and public per-user pricing in docs). The biggest reason it’s missing from shortlist answers for enterprise/startup/remote/timeline/dependency/creative-agency queries is likely weak evaluation-stage structured extractability (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/ratings schema not found) plus thin secondary review/analyst coverage (no clear TrustRadius/Gartner Peer Insights signals found). Highest-ROI fix: add crawlable SoftwareApplication + FAQPage schema on evaluation pages (including explicit answers for the gap queries) and ensure those pages are SSR-indexed so AI engines can cite them reliably.

Based on audit of ones.com · May 6, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy