[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/nOps
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

0

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

56

across 68 prompts

AI Share of Voice

56%

across 68 prompts

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
21 category
Cited100%21/21
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors4.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories nOps is visible in

1
  • Cloud Cost Managementnot yet measured→

Executive summary

nOps is strongly positioned for AI citation in evaluation and trust prompts because it has 138 G2 reviews with a 4.8★ rating and a visible pricing page with a clear pricing model (fixed fee + share of savings). The biggest risk is conversion-stage citation for the exact query pattern “How much does nOps cost?” because the pricing page does not expose specific tier prices in the crawlable content (it uses “Request Pricing” / “pricing: fixed fee based on cloud spend” language).

Based on audit of nops.io · Jun 4, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy