[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Newrelic
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

71

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

26

across 197 prompts

AI Share of Voice

28%

across 197 prompts

Category Visibility

#17

in Observability & APM · of 44

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
107 category
Cited58%62/107
Share of voice35%avg
Engine consensus33%of engines
Competitors10.5avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
9 brand-level
Cited89%8/9
Share of voice89%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.3avg/cited
Sentimentpositive11+ / 13~ / 0−
🛡️Trust
5 brand-level
Cited100%5/5
Share of voice90%avg
Engine consensus90%of engines
Competitors1.4avg/cited
Sentimentneutral2+ / 10~ / 0−
💰Conversion
7 brand-level
Cited86%6/7
Share of voice67%avg
Engine consensus78%of engines
Competitors2.0avg/cited
Sentimentneutral1+ / 11~ / 0−

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Newrelic is visible in

1
  • Observability & APM17 of 44→

Executive summary

New Relic is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage observability queries because it has strong third-party review authority (e.g., 583 G2 reviews) and first-party competitive comparison pages (e.g., New Relic vs Sumo Logic). The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen structured-data coverage for AI evaluation queries (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) across key product and comparison pages so models can reliably extract “what it is / who it’s for / pricing / integrations” without relying on third parties.

Based on audit of newrelic.com · Jun 8, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy