AI Visibility
measured42/100
Frequently Cited · in Developer Tools
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals46/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
100
across 117 prompts
AI Share of Voice
100%
across 117 prompts
Critical Issues
2
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Developer Tools
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Neovim.io is likely to be cited for “what is Neovim” and “how to use Neovim” style queries, but it’s weak for AI evaluation/conversion patterns because it’s not a B2B SaaS purchase category (no pricing tiers, no SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured evaluation surfaces). The single highest-ROI fix is to add explicit, crawlable schema-backed Q&A and product-style pages that answer evaluation questions (e.g., “Neovim vs Vim/VS Code”) in a way AI can quote directly.
Based on audit of neovim.io · Oct 2, 2026