AI Visibility
measured33/100
Emerging · in Product Experience
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals2/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
26
across 194 prompts
AI Share of Voice
26%
across 194 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Product Experience
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Navattic is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries like “Navattic reviews” and “Navattic vs [competitor]” because it has strong G2 presence (1,095+ reviews and ~4.8 stars) and active TrustRadius coverage (15 reviews, 9.1/10). The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen first-party evaluation surfaces (especially SoftwareApplication/FAQPage coverage and additional indexed “Navattic vs …” pages) so AI can cite Navattic directly for comparison and pricing intent—not just via third-party review sites.
Based on audit of navattic.com · Sep 29, 2026