AI Visibility
measured26/100
Emerging · in Benefits Administration
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals5/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
11
across 143 prompts
AI Share of Voice
11%
across 143 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
Shortlist Position
4/80
Not Visible · Benefits Administration Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Benefits Administration
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Your visibility gap
Nava Benefits surfaces in 4/80 Benefits Administration discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 76 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
navabenefits.com is a B2B benefits administration brand with meaningful AI citation signals (e.g., G2 presence with 69 reviews and 4.8/5). The biggest citation risk is evaluation-stage coverage for enterprise and automation queries (e.g., “top benefits administration solutions for enterprise companies” and “how to automate benefits enrollment processes”), which likely lack dedicated, crawlable first-party pages that AI engines can quote.
Based on audit of navabenefits.com · Sep 1, 2026