AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in Image Generation
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals54/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
9
across 163 prompts
AI Share of Voice
9%
across 163 prompts
Critical Issues
6
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Image Generation
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
MyArchitectAI is already strongly cited for evaluation-stage prompts via its G2 presence (24 reviews, 4.6★) and first-party pricing visibility ($96/$192/$384 per year shown). The biggest AI-citation risk is conversion-stage and evaluation-stage “brand vs competitor” queries for your exact competitor set (D5 Render, Enscape 3D, Meshy, SketchUp, Revit) because first-party comparison coverage is incomplete for those exact pairs (e.g., no clear “MyArchitectAI vs Enscape 3D” page found; “D5 Render vs Lumion” exists instead). Highest-ROI fix: create/expand first-party, brand-led comparison pages that explicitly answer “How does MyArchitectAI compare to D5 Render?” and “How does MyArchitectAI compare to Enscape 3D?” with crawlable, SSR content and evaluation-focused FAQ blocks.
Based on audit of myarchitectai.com · Sep 1, 2026