AI Visibility
measured50/100
Frequently Cited · in Managed AI Inference
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals46/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
57
across 925 prompts
AI Share of Voice
57%
across 925 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Managed AI Inference
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Modal is likely to be cited for conversion and cost queries because its pricing page is publicly accessible and shows per-GPU/per-second rates (e.g., Nvidia H100/H200/B200) and Starter plan details. The biggest AI-citation risk is evaluation-stage comparison coverage: live search did not surface first-party “[Modal] vs RunPod” / “[Modal] vs Replicate” pages, and there’s no evidence of SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured data on key pages—so AI engines may rely on third-party sources instead of citing modal.com for shortlist-style questions.
Based on audit of modal.com · May 4, 2026