[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Maestra
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

0

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

5

across 310 prompts

AI Share of Voice

5%

across 310 prompts

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Shortlist Position

0/80

Not Visible · Content Marketing Discovery

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
180 category
Cited1%2/180
Share of voice1%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Maestra is visible in

2
  • Content Marketingnot yet measured→
  • Video Editingnot yet measured→

Your visibility gap

Maestra surfaces in 0/80 Content Marketing discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 80 prompts you're missing and how to win them.

Claim Maestra →

Executive summary

Maestra is already well-positioned for evaluation-stage AI citations via strong G2 presence (4.7★, 69 reviews on G2) and first-party comparison content (e.g., Klaviyo vs Maestra-style comparison pages). The biggest risk is discovery-stage invisibility for Content Marketing prompts (0/80), so the highest-ROI fix is to publish crawlable, self-contained content-marketing strategy/solutions pages that directly answer the missing enterprise/SaaS/team queries.

Based on audit of maestra.io · May 28, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy