AI Visibility
measured35/100
Emerging · in Digital Asset Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals2/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
19
across 180 prompts
AI Share of Voice
19%
across 180 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Digital Asset Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
LucidLink is a B2B SaaS with strong AI-citation inputs from G2 (781 reviews) and enterprise credibility via Gartner Peer Insights. The biggest risk to appearing in evaluation-stage “alternatives/compare” answers is missing/unclear first-party comparison coverage and incomplete AI-discoverability controls (llms.txt/robots.txt could not be verified). Highest-ROI fix: publish/expand first-party, brand-led comparison pages (e.g., “LucidLink vs Egnyte/Dropbox/OneDrive”) with evaluation-ready structure and ensure AI crawler access + llms.txt are correctly deployed.
Based on audit of lucidlink.com · Sep 29, 2026