[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/LinkSquares
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

25

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

52

across 230 prompts

AI Share of Voice

52%

across 230 prompts

Category Visibility

#12

in Contract Lifecycle Management · of 60

Critical Issues

7

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
137 category
Cited69%95/137
Share of voice54%avg
Engine consensus44%of engines
Competitors11.7avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories LinkSquares is visible in

1
  • Contract Lifecycle Management12 of 60→

Executive summary

LinkSquares is highly likely to be cited for evaluation-stage prompts because it has strong G2 authority (427 reviews, 4.7/5) and active first-party comparison content (e.g., DocuSign CLM comparison). The single highest-ROI fix is to improve crawlable, schema-backed evaluation surfaces for pricing and comparison queries (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage + making pricing tiers machine-readable), because the current first-party pricing page is quote-based and does not expose tiered prices to AI crawlers.

Based on audit of linksquares.com · May 8, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy