[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Konghq
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

66

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

64

across 8 prompts

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
no prompts at this stage
—
⚖️Evaluation
6 brand-level
Cited100%6/6
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors3.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
1 brand-level
Cited100%1/1
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors2.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
1 brand-level
Cited100%1/1
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors2.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Executive summary

Konghq.com is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong G2 traction (308 reviews, 4.4★) and first-party head-to-head comparison content (e.g., Kong vs MuleSoft, Kong vs Apigee). The single highest-ROI fix is to ensure crawlable, schema-rich conversion content for pricing/cost queries (public, SSR, and structured) so models can answer “How much does Kong cost?” directly from konghq.com rather than deferring to third parties.

Based on audit of konghq.com · Jun 7, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy