AI Visibility
measured41/100
Frequently Cited · in Sales Engagement
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals57/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
94
across 101 prompts
AI Share of Voice
100%
across 85 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Sales Engagement
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Executive summary
Klue is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong G2 presence (538 reviews, 4.8/5) and first-party comparison content like “Klue vs Crayon.” The single highest-ROI fix is to improve conversion-stage crawlability by publishing a publicly readable pricing page (or pricing details in SSR) so AI can answer “Klue pricing” without relying on third-party pricing pages.
Based on audit of klue.com · Oct 15, 2026