[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Jenkins
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

21

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

85

across 622 prompts

AI Share of Voice

85%

across 622 prompts

Category Visibility

#5

in CI/CD · of 75

Critical Issues

5

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
357 category
Cited86%306/357
Share of voice82%avg
Engine consensus64%of engines
Competitors5.8avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Jenkins is visible in

2
  • DevOps Automation3 of 11→
  • CI/CD6 of 75→

Executive summary

Jenkins is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party B2B review presence (e.g., Capterra shows 568 reviews at 4.5). The biggest citation risk is that jenkins.io itself appears to lack first-party, crawlable evaluation assets (notably SoftwareApplication/FAQPage-style structured evaluation content and first-party brand-vs-competitor comparison pages), forcing AI to rely on third parties instead of citing Jenkins directly.

Based on audit of jenkins.io · May 6, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy