AI Visibility
measured74/100
Frequently Cited · in Contract Lifecycle Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals18/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
92
across 573 prompts
AI Share of Voice
93%
across 554 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Contract Lifecycle Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
AI citation readiness for the CLM software brand is likely weak because ironclad.com appears to be primarily a non-software consumer/manufacturing site (e.g., product pages like gloves/warranty) rather than the CLM SaaS domain. The single highest-ROI fix is to ensure the correct CLM SaaS entity/domain is used for Ironclad (e.g., ironcladapp.com / ironclad.ai) and then implement B2B SaaS structured data + first-party comparison/pricing pages on that correct domain.
Based on audit of ironclad.com · Apr 1, 2026