[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Ironclad
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

18

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

92

across 572 prompts

AI Share of Voice

93%

across 553 prompts

Category Visibility

#1

in Contract Lifecycle Management · of 60

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
338 category
Cited100%338/338
Share of voice96%avg
Engine consensus84%of engines
Competitors9.1avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
12 brand-level
Cited92%11/12
Share of voice92%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors0.7avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
6 brand-level
Cited67%4/6
Share of voice67%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors2.5avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
5 brand-level
Cited80%4/5
Share of voice80%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.3avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Ironclad is visible in

1
  • Contract Lifecycle Management1 of 60→

Executive summary

AI citation readiness for the CLM software brand is likely weak because ironclad.com appears to be primarily a non-software consumer/manufacturing site (e.g., product pages like gloves/warranty) rather than the CLM SaaS domain. The single highest-ROI fix is to ensure the correct CLM SaaS entity/domain is used for Ironclad (e.g., ironcladapp.com / ironclad.ai) and then implement B2B SaaS structured data + first-party comparison/pricing pages on that correct domain.

Based on audit of ironclad.com · Apr 1, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy