AI Visibility
measured33/100
Emerging · in Billing & Invoicing
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals4/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
21
across 170 prompts
AI Share of Voice
21%
across 170 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Billing & Invoicing
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Invoice Ninja has meaningful AI-citation signals for evaluation queries via G2 (22 reviews, 4.3/5) and Capterra (166 reviews, 4.7/5), plus public, tiered pricing on its own site. The biggest citation risk is conversion-stage and structured extraction: the site’s pricing is crawlable, but there’s no confirmed SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured data and no confirmed llms.txt, which reduces likelihood of being cited in “what is / pricing / integrations” AI Overviews.
Based on audit of invoiceninja.com · Jun 4, 2026