[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Instructure Inc
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

71

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

75

across 11 prompts

AI Share of Voice

100%

across 3 prompts

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
5 category
Cited100%5/5
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
5 brand-level
Cited100%5/5
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors1.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
no prompts at this stage
—
💰Conversion
1 brand-level
Cited100%1/1
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Executive summary

Instructure is strongly positioned for AI citation on evaluation-stage comparison queries because it has first-party comparison content (e.g., Canvas LMS comparisons vs Moodle/Blackboard/D2L) and very strong G2 review volume (1,800+ reviews, 4.5★). The single highest-ROI fix is to publish crawlable, tiered pricing content for Canvas (not just “connect for a quote”), because the query pattern “How much does Instructure cost?” and conversion-stage prompts are currently hard for AI engines to cite from first-party pages.

Based on audit of instructure.com · Jun 3, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy