AI Visibility
measured28/100
Emerging · in Content & Knowledge
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals53/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
8
across 323 prompts
AI Share of Voice
8%
across 323 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Content & Knowledge
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Insense is strongly AI-citable for evaluation-stage queries because it has a large G2 presence (374 reviews, 4.5/5, Grid Leader) and first-party pricing plus multiple outcome-dense case studies. The biggest risk is conversion-stage citation for “Insense pricing” and evaluation-stage “Insense vs competitor” queries if AI crawlers can’t reliably read/structure pricing and comparison content (and if SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/LLM discoverability files are missing). Highest-ROI fix: ensure full B2B structured data coverage (SoftwareApplication + FAQPage + Product/Offer on pricing) and add/strengthen first-party “Insense vs [top competitor]” pages that are clearly brand-led and crawlable.
Based on audit of insense.pro · Sep 1, 2026