[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Inriver
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

5

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

22

across 181 prompts

AI Share of Voice

22%

across 181 prompts

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
107 category
Cited19%20/107
Share of voice17%avg
Engine consensus33%of engines
Competitors5.4avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Inriver is visible in

1
  • Digital Asset Managementnot yet measured→

Executive summary

Inriver is already strongly positioned for AI citation on evaluation-stage comparison queries because it has first-party pages like “Inriver vs Salsify” and “Inriver vs Akeneo” plus a public pricing-plan page. The biggest remaining risk is conversion-stage and structured extraction: pricing appears to be “fully customizable” with “Get in touch” tiers (not public price points), and there’s no detectable SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/aggregateRating structured data surfaced in search results.

Based on audit of inriver.com · Jun 9, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy