[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Informatica Supplier 360
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

63

Growing Presence

Avg Prompt Score

9

across 106 prompts

AI Share of Voice

0%

across 90 prompts

Critical Issues

5

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
90 brand-level
Cited0%0/90
Share of voice0%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors—
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
8 brand-level
Cited100%8/8
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors1.9avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.5avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited75%3/4
Share of voice75%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors1.7avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Informatica Supplier 360 is visible in

1
  • Digital Asset Managementnot yet measured→

Executive summary

Informatica is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review presence (e.g., G2 seller page and multiple TrustRadius/Gartner Peer Insights product pages). The single highest-ROI fix is to add/strengthen first-party, brand-led evaluation content (especially “[Informatica] vs [Competitor]” and “Informatica pricing” pages that are crawlable and structured) so AI can cite Informatica directly for conversion and comparison prompts.

Based on audit of informatica.com · Jun 10, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy