AI Visibility
measured47/100
Frequently Cited · in Digital Advertising
measured from this brand's audit prompts
AEO Readiness
fundamentals10/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
14
across 154 prompts
AI Share of Voice
14%
across 154 prompts
Critical Issues
6
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Digital Advertising
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured across this brand's own audit prompts (it isn't in a tracked category rollup yet). Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
inBeat is highly likely to be cited for evaluation-stage “best influencer marketing platform” and “alternatives” queries because it has 585 G2 reviews at 4.9★. The single highest-ROI fix is to add/strengthen first-party, crawlable evaluation pages for the exact comparison and pricing prompts (especially “How does inBeat compare to GRIN?” / “How does inBeat compare to Upfluence?” / “How much does inBeat cost?”) so AI engines can cite inbeat.co directly instead of relying on G2 and third-party pages.
Based on audit of inbeat.co · May 7, 2026