AI Visibility
measured53/100
Frequently Cited · in PDF Tools
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals26/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
32
across 145 prompts
AI Share of Voice
32%
across 145 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in PDF Tools
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
iLovePDF is likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has a strong G2 presence (583 reviews on its G2 seller page) and publicly accessible pricing with tier details (Free, Premium with $5/month, and a Business plan). The biggest risk for AI citation is conversion-stage “pricing/plan” and evaluation-stage “SoftwareApplication/structured evaluation” signals: schema evidence for SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/AggregateRating was not found in live search, and first-party comparison pages on ilovepdf.com were not surfaced in search results.
Based on audit of ilovepdf.com · Oct 7, 2026