AEO Score
53
Growing Presence
Avg Prompt Score
95
across 168 prompts
AI Share of Voice
100%
across 152 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Executive summary
IFS is highly likely to be cited for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review presence on G2 (multiple IFS products) and visible Gartner Peer Insights pages for IFS products. The single highest-ROI fix is to add/expand first-party, brand-led evaluation content (especially crawlable “[IFS product] vs [competitor]” pages and a publicly readable pricing page) so AI engines can cite IFS directly for comparison and cost queries rather than relying on third parties.
Based on audit of ifs.com · May 6, 2026