AI Visibility
measured33/100
Emerging · in Nonprofit Software
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals1/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
9
across 154 prompts
AI Share of Voice
9%
across 154 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Nonprofit Software
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Idealist is visible in
1Executive summary
Idealist.org is moderately visible to AI engines via third-party review platforms (notably G2 shows 19 reviews with a 4.3 rating), but it is unlikely to be strongly cited for B2B evaluation queries because it lacks clear, crawlable first-party evaluation assets (especially SoftwareApplication/FAQ-style structured Q&A and robust comparison/pricing surfaces). The single highest-ROI fix is to add/expand crawlable, structured first-party pages that answer evaluation-style questions (what it is, who it’s for, pricing to post listings, and integrations) with schema that AI can reliably extract.
Based on audit of idealist.org · Oct 7, 2026