AI Visibility
measured64/100
Frequently Cited · in Compliance Automation
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals43/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
79
across 741 prompts
AI Share of Voice
79%
across 741 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Compliance Automation
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Hyperproof is a B2B GRC/compliance operations SaaS with strong AI-citation inputs from G2 (216 reviews, 4.5/5) and secondary review presence on Capterra (115 reviews, 4.8) and TrustRadius (14 reviews, 9.1). The biggest risk to appearing in evaluation-stage AI answers is missing/uncertain crawlable structured data (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) and potentially non-crawlable technical surfaces (robots/llms/sitemaps not verifiable via search), so the highest-ROI fix is to ensure SSR + schema coverage for pricing/evaluation pages and verify AI crawler access.
Based on audit of hyperproof.io · Jun 6, 2026