AI Visibility
measured33/100
Emerging · in Developer Tools
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals46/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
92
across 16 prompts
AI Share of Voice
92%
across 16 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Developer Tools
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Executive summary
AI citation readiness for LF Decentralized Trust is moderate because the site is crawlable and has strong third-party authority signals (e.g., G2 seller page for The Linux Foundation with 348 reviews and 4.5/5). The biggest risk is conversion-stage evaluation queries (pricing + “worth it” + enterprise fit) because there is no clear, productized SaaS pricing page for LF Decentralized Trust itself and no first-party “[LF Decentralized Trust] vs Hyperledger/Ethereum” comparison pages found.
Based on audit of lfdecentralizedtrust.org · Sep 2, 2026