AI Visibility
measured45/100
Frequently Cited · in 3D & CAD
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals5/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
15
across 339 prompts
AI Share of Voice
15%
across 339 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in 3D & CAD
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
SideFX is likely to be cited by AI engines for Houdini-related evaluation queries because it has a first-party, crawlable comparison/pricing surface (e.g., /products/compare/ with explicit USD tiers) and strong third-party social authority via its LinkedIn company page. The biggest risk is evaluation-stage citation for “best/alternatives” style queries: SideFX lacks clearly discoverable G2/Capterra/TrustRadius/analyst profiles beyond the single G2 seller page surfaced in search, and there’s no evidence (from live search) of SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured data that AI Overviews can reliably extract.
Based on audit of sidefx.com · Sep 30, 2026