AI Visibility
measured49/100
Frequently Cited · in Serverless & Edge
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals58/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
75
across 231 prompts
AI Share of Voice
77%
across 231 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
Brand Accuracy
3/81
citations with inaccuracies
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Serverless & Edge
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Heroku is visible in
1Executive summary
Heroku is very likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review presence (e.g., TrustRadius 178 reviews and Gartner Peer Insights 73 ratings) and a publicly crawlable pricing page with specific dyno tiers. The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen first-party evaluation content for comparison/evaluation queries (e.g., explicit “[Heroku] vs [Competitor]” pages and FAQ-style evaluation blocks) so AI engines can cite Heroku’s own reasoning instead of relying mainly on third-party review sources.
Based on audit of heroku.com · May 4, 2026