AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in Wiki & Docs
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals52/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
100
across 16 prompts
AI Share of Voice
100%
across 16 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Wiki & Docs
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
HelpNDoc is likely to be cited for evaluation-stage queries because it has an active G2 presence (18 reviews shown on its G2 product reviews page) and a crawlable first-party store page with explicit tier pricing (e.g., 99€ / 299€ / 499€ and floating options). The biggest AI-citation risk is conversion/evaluation comparison intent: there is no clear evidence of first-party “[HelpNDoc] vs [Competitor]” pages on helpndoc.com, so AI engines may rely on third-party comparison surfaces instead of citing HelpNDoc directly.
Based on audit of helpndoc.com · Oct 7, 2026