[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/HealthStream Jane
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

44

Growing Presence

Avg Prompt Score

53

across 13 prompts

AI Share of Voice

100%

across 2 prompts

Critical Issues

5

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
4 category
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
6 brand-level
Cited17%1/6
Share of voice17%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors4.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
2 brand-level
Cited100%2/2
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors1.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
1 brand-level
Cited0%0/1
Share of voice0%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors—
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Executive summary

HealthStream is a B2B healthcare LMS vendor with strong third-party review authority (G2 seller page shows 856 reviews on G2 for HealthStream, and TrustRadius shows 37 reviews for HealthStream Learning Management System). The biggest AI-citation risk is evaluation-stage comparison and pricing: the site appears to rely on “Request Demo” rather than publicly crawlable pricing, and first-party “[Brand] vs [Competitor]” pages for Relias/Absorb LMS/Docebo/Cornerstone OnDemand/UKG were not found in live search—so AI engines have fewer on-domain sources to cite for “compare” and “cost” prompts.

Based on audit of healthstream.com · May 7, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy