AI Visibility
measured19/100
Emerging · in CI/CD
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals5/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
5
across 362 prompts
AI Share of Voice
5%
across 362 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in CI/CD
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Harness is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review/analyst presence (G2 and Gartner Peer Insights found) and a publicly accessible pricing page. The highest-ROI fix is to strengthen crawlable evaluation content for comparison/pricing intent (e.g., SoftwareApplication/FAQPage coverage and first-party “Harness vs competitor” pages) so AI can cite Harness directly for shortlist formation rather than relying on third-party sources.
Based on audit of harness.io · May 7, 2026