[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Grafana Labs
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

72

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

84

across 50 prompts

AI Share of Voice

100%

across 30 prompts

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
21 category
Cited100%21/21
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
13 brand-level
Cited85%11/13
Share of voice85%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.2avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
3 brand-level
Cited100%3/3
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Executive summary

Grafana is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for category and evaluation queries because it has strong third-party B2B review authority (e.g., G2 and TrustRadius) and a publicly crawlable pricing page with explicit tiers/prices. The biggest remaining citation risk is evaluation-stage comparison-page coverage and structured-data completeness (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage), which can limit how often Grafana is selected in “X vs Y” and “pricing” answer blocks.

Based on audit of grafana.com · Apr 2, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy