AI Visibility
measured19/100
Emerging · in Container Orchestration
measured from this brand's audit prompts
AEO Readiness
fundamentals79/100
Solid fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
15
across 86 prompts
AI Share of Voice
0%
across 70 prompts
Critical Issues
2
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Container Orchestration
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured across this brand's own audit prompts (it isn't in a tracked category rollup yet). Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
cloud.google.com is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation and conversion queries because it has strong third-party review/analyst coverage (e.g., Gartner Peer Insights and TrustRadius) and publicly accessible pricing pages (e.g., BigQuery pricing, Compute Engine all-pricing). The single highest-ROI fix is to ensure SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured data exists on the most important product/pricing pages for AI extraction (and to validate crawlability/SSR for those pages), because that directly improves AI answer eligibility for “what is / pricing / integrations” prompts.
Based on audit of cloud.google.com · May 6, 2026