AI Visibility
measured41/100
Frequently Cited · in Nonprofit Software
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals2/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
16
across 163 prompts
AI Share of Voice
16%
across 163 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Nonprofit Software
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories GiveSmart is visible in
1Executive summary
GiveSmart is strongly positioned for AI citation on evaluation and trust queries because it has high-rated, high-volume third-party review profiles (e.g., 157 G2 reviews at 4.5★ per your pre-verified context; 220 TrustRadius reviews; 211 Capterra reviews). The single highest-ROI fix is to add/expand first-party, crawlable evaluation content that directly targets competitor-specific comparison queries (e.g., GiveSmart vs Bonterra OneCause / Greater Giving) and to ensure structured data (SoftwareApplication + FAQPage) is present so AI engines can cite it for “how much does GiveSmart cost?” and “is it worth it?” patterns.
Based on audit of givesmart.com · Oct 3, 2026