AI Visibility
measured33/100
Emerging · in Developer Tools
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals65/100
Solid fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
72
across 24 prompts
AI Share of Voice
100%
across 8 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Developer Tools
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Executive summary
gamemaker.io is likely to be cited for discovery and trust queries around “GameMaker” (e.g., tutorials and community discussions), but it is weak for evaluation-style AI queries that require structured, crawlable product/comparison signals. The single highest-ROI fix is to add/strengthen structured evaluation content (FAQPage + comparison/pricing Q&A blocks) and ensure key pages are consistently crawlable/SSR so AI engines can quote them for “pricing” and “alternatives” patterns.
Based on audit of gamemaker.io · Aug 29, 2026