[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Frame.io
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

21

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

51

across 524 prompts

AI Share of Voice

51%

across 524 prompts

Category Visibility

#4

in Video Editing · of 93

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
374 category
Cited68%253/374
Share of voice60%avg
Engine consensus52%of engines
Competitors5.9avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Frame.io is visible in

2
  • Video Editing4 of 93→
  • Digital Asset Management22 of 113→

Executive summary

frame.io is already strongly cited for evaluation-stage queries via high-volume G2 and secondary review sources (e.g., 173 G2 reviews, 97 TrustRadius reviews, 80 Capterra reviews). The biggest AI citation risk is conversion-stage and evaluation-stage “how much / pricing / structured evaluation” queries: while pricing is publicly crawlable with explicit tiers ($0/$15/$25), there’s no clear evidence (from live checks) of SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/aggregateRating structured data on first-party pages—so AI engines may under-cite frame.io for pricing and comparison prompts.

Based on audit of frame.io · May 8, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy