AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in Revenue Operations & Intelligence
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals34/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
5
across 240 prompts
AI Share of Voice
5%
across 240 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Revenue Operations & Intelligence
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
frame.ai shows meaningful B2B brand signals via a LinkedIn company page and third-party coverage (e.g., Crunchbase News), but it is weakly positioned for AI evaluation queries because first-party evaluation surfaces (pricing/comparison) and structured data signals were not discoverable in live search. The single highest-ROI fix is to publish/ensure crawlable, SSR-rendered pricing + first-party “[Frame AI] vs [Competitor]” (or “alternatives to Frame AI”) pages that AI engines can cite for evaluation and conversion prompts.
Based on audit of frame.ai · Sep 2, 2026