[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Fly.io
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

46

Growing Presence

Avg Prompt Score

53

across 255 prompts

AI Share of Voice

55%

across 255 prompts

Category Visibility

#7

in Serverless & Edge · of 58

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
157 category
Cited73%115/157
Share of voice66%avg
Engine consensus57%of engines
Competitors5.9avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice75%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors3.0avg/cited
Sentimentpositive3+ / 6~ / 0−
🛡️Trust
3 brand-level
Cited100%3/3
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors3.7avg/cited
Sentimentpositive6+ / 3~ / 0−
💰Conversion
1 brand-level
Cited100%1/1
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentimentneutral0+ / 3~ / 0−

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Fly.io is visible in

1
  • Serverless & Edge7 of 58→

Executive summary

Fly.io is a B2B application server platform with a small but strong G2 signal (3 reviews, 4.7★) ([g2.com](https://www.g2.com/products/fly-io/reviews?utm_source=openai)), plus active Reddit discussion that helps Perplexity-style “best/alternatives” queries ([reddit.com](https://www.reddit.com/r/elixir/comments/1h8ajm2/is_flyio_ridiculously_expensive/?utm_source=openai)). The biggest AI-citation risk is evaluation-stage coverage: there are no clearly crawlable first-party “[Fly] vs Render/Railway” pages found, and pricing is documented as usage-based resource pricing (not simple tiered plans), which can reduce “How much does Fly cost?” citation reliability ([fly.io](https://fly.io/docs/about/pricing/?utm_source=openai)).

Based on audit of fly.io · May 4, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy